XML 1.1 Names
We have seen a lot of E-Mail's, of late, regarding the new definition of a name, etc in XML 1.1 and how much trouble this is going to cause compatibility. I'm interested to hear from people who think this is a good thing and why? I know that the relaxation of what a name is, means that the XML spec will not have to change every time the Unicode spec does, but is this a good thing? XML 1.0(+ bits) is great. It’s nice, it’s simple and it works and the really great thing is that it works everywhere! With XML 1.1 there is a danger of creating documents that no longer work in older products and this means upgrades, testing, re-configuration, etc, etc… great for the vendors but what about the users and legacy systems? Cheers, -PF
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format