[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Non XML syntaxes

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Non XML syntaxes
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 01:48:49 +1000
• References: <200210081536.LAA01495@m...> <200210081533.QAA21587@p...>

From: "David Carlisle" <davidc@n...>

> However your main point is still valid, and both eqn
> and TeX are a lot easier to author by hand than MathML 

http://www.idealliance.org/papers/extreme02/html/2002/Rosenblum01/EML2002Rosenblum01.html
has a survey of technical publishing companies, and how they do
equations.

It does not mention the editors they use, which would be useful,
but most use TeX or the ISO 12083 DTD which allows 
shortreferences. 

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Non XML syntaxes
    • From: Mark Doyle <doyle@a...>
  • Re: Non XML syntaxes
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • Re: Non XML syntaxes
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: Non XML syntaxes
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Next by Date: Re: RE: Sky is falling again...
• Previous by thread: Re: Non XML syntaxes
• Next by thread: Re: Non XML syntaxes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread