RE: limits of the generic
> Clark's or Mike Kay's authority. Now I'm an invited expert on the WG I > can argue, I can vote, I can register dissent, but I doubt that any of > that will turn this juggernaut around. can't beat em, join em ( and beat em ). > XSLT and XPath users of the world, unite! The WGs will take your > silence as approval, not disgust. Send your comments to > public-qt-comments@w.... It doesn't matter if you don't have a > solution to all of XPath's woes -- the WGs are there to create the > solutions -- but it does matter if you think the languages are off > track, especially if that means you're not going to use them. None of > us want XPath/XSLT 2.0 to turn into another W3C XML Schema or XLink. lets be honest, Jeni, the silence from most users is mainly due to the investment in time to review the bewildering array of documents ... we know that you must live in some interdimensional space that allows for full absorption of the issues that matter.... the W3C is un/knowingly using the legal chestnut of 'choking your opposition with paper' which of course gives members the ability to silently follow their own agendas; none of this stuff is rocket science...yet some days my head feels like it is. Your best bet is to create an issues overview document which is written for the 80%; better yet if written by Jeni Tennison, Michael Kay, and James Clark. A shadow TAG cabinet.... gl, jim fuller
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format