|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Specs are not insane, people are
From: "Paul Prescod" <paul@p...> > tblanchard@m... wrote: > > 4) Schema is really an insane spec. > > Try RELAX, Schematron or Examplotron. Apparantly, according to Aristotle's splendidly named Posterior Analytics[1] we understand by starting from what is well-known and going to what is less well-known. So people judge a schema language by their expectations, expertise, knowledge. Most people think Schematron is simple but one commentary found it difficult! There will always be differences, especially because schema languages for XML are not really primary logical data models (as many would like) or predicates that allow a mapping of relations to physical structures, but rather are a physical model. Consequently, most schema languages for XML will work best (if one is trying to use them as a logical model) for data sets when there is little difference between the logical and the physical. ?Which kinds of data are these: trivially, heirarchical structures with a strong ordering between elements. And, structures which can typically be processed efficiently by knowledge of the ancestors and their attributes. So the issue is not "why is this spec insane?" but "are the people who made it insane?" to which the answer will in most cases be "no, they are rationally trying to solve a particular set of problems, but their problems are probably not your problems". And hence, their standards need not be our standards. Cheers Rick Jelliffe [1] e.g. http://willwilkinson.net/essays/Aristotle.html also influences Arabic and Scholastic philosophy[2[ [2] http://www.muslimphilosophy.com/rep/H021.htm
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








