[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Living Documents (Was: We need SAX etc ..)

• To: joe@b... (Joe Gregorio)
• Subject: Re: Re: Living Documents (Was: We need SAX etc ..)
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:39:28 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: jcowan@r... (John Cowan), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3DB9810B.6020008@b...> from "Joe Gregorio" at Oct 25, 2002 01:36:11 PM

Joe Gregorio scripsit:

> I completely agree. So where exactly does that leave RDF? :)

The same place it leaves all other texts: useful, but not universally so.
RDF formalizes a way to make statements that involve references, that's all.

	Two experts*, to explicate Meaning,
	Wrote a book called _The Meaning of Meaning_.
		The public perplexed,
		Three experts penned next
	_The Meaning of Meaning of Meaning_.

* C.K. Ogden and I.A. Richards.

-- 
De plichten van een docent zijn divers,         John Cowan
die van het gehoor ook.                         jcowan@r...
      --Edsger Dijkstra                         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

• References:
  • Re: Re: Living Documents (Was: We need SAX etc ..)
    • From: Joe Gregorio <joe@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Living Documents (Was: We need SAX etc ..)
• Next by Date: Oracle table to XML file
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Living Documents (Was: We need SAX etc ..)
• Next by thread: Priority XML errata and design issues?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread