Re: We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML
Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit: > Well, that's one of the tricky points. It is *not* a well-formedness > error for an XML 1.0 document to label itself version="1.1", > version="2.0", or version="mauve". This is neither a violation of the > BNF grammar nor any well-formedness constraint in the XML 1.0 spec. Read the errata page. -- John Cowan <jcowan@r...> http://www.reutershealth.com http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Yakka foob mog. Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork. Chumble spuzz. -- Calvin, giving Newton's First Law "in his own words"
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format