Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
On Friday 18 October 2002 2:21 pm, David Rosenborg wrote: > For the reasons I mention above I think it is much more efficient to manage > a set of largely static styling properties in CSS files rather than in > the XSLT files. Why? I mean, if you're editing CSS applied to XSL-FO (with added class-like structures here and there), why's this much simpler than editing the XSLT and directly attacking the almost CSS2-alike properties in the transform, pertinent to the parts of the result tree where they will be emitted? I don't see one as much easier than the other - CSS and CSS2 are so close to XSL-FO's properties as to be for all intents and purposes a working overlap. That is, if you know all of CSS2, you'll not be particularly surprised when you see it all again in XML attribute form masquerading as XSL-FO properties, but geared specifically for the environment (those objects - the formatting ones). Going back to CSS2 to leverage an XSL-FO doc on its way to becoming a 'real' PDF is not only odd, but a bit too web-tech like to be convincingly the 'proper' way to do it. Not that I'm about to stop you from it - carry on, if it feels good. -- Ian Tindale
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format