Re: Is XHTML 2.0 already an Anachronism?
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 8:08 pm, AndrewWatt2000@a... wrote: > If backwards compatibility is explicitly not an aim for XHTML 2.0 then what > reasons are there for persevering with further development of HTML? A related sentiment would be 'what reasons are there for persevering with the late-90's model of browsing the web with an all-in-one amazing performing web browser that is percieved as a bigger thing than the computer OS'? In other words, given that in the old days when browsers first emerged, pretty much the only way of experiencing the web was through a desktop computer, or a laptop enslaved to a modem connected to a phone socket (which amounts to the same thing). Today is different - we can experience the web without a complicated computer that's always going wrong (or it seems that way to most non computer experts), using such appliances as PDAs or the nicer and newer phones that are appearing. We can also do it without needing to be near a phone socket or mains supply - or if we do, we can chose to do it using a familiar and trusted box such as the television. None of those items implicitly bring a legacy browser with them, and when they do have something that you'd recognise as a 'browser', it's often a fairly slim affair the purpose of which is to present you with the content only, not something that promotes itself, its parent company, festooned with buttons menus and controls, and generally tries to run your life for you. This is where XHTML 2 can afford the clean break it would make. We need things which will make the clumsy self-opiniated legacy desktop browser dinosaurs look pretty silly, and maybe they'll all die out eventually. Also coming to mind are things such as KDE's Konqueror (or Apple's old Cyberdog) - where the user doesn't (or need not) differentiate whether they're opening a window to a local folder, a networked folder, or a web resource somewhere - it's all just basically the act of opening a window to 'something', and witnessing the manifestation of what's in there. Is this browsing, or just opening a window? I think the difference in semantics and perception is important. -- Ian Tindale
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format