[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]

• To: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:52:46 -0400
• In-reply-to: <fgm4ouoce6ii3ki9k159u7c976436t3h6r@4...>
• References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020913173001.00c2d330@m...><2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B949@HQ5><4.3.2.7.2.20020913173001.00c2d330@m...>

At 09:35 PM 9/13/2002 +0000, Arjun Ray wrote:
>Ann Navarro <ann@w...> wrote:
>
>| The point of the message is the linking examples, not an ideological
>| argument about application construction.
>
>The lesson from the message is that namespaces and colonification are
>
>   ***   *B* *R* *O* *K* *E* *N*   ***
>
>The pope and his nuncio, of course, aren't listening.  And so WGs are
>caught in the toils of a disaster not of their own making.


Exactly.

We're rowing with the oars that we have. Until decisions are made to fix 
other things, we have no choice but to keep toiling. See TAG and Namespaces 
1.1 Last Call to fix that situation.

Ann

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• References:
  • RE: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • RE: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration languages]
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
• Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
• Previous by thread: Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
• Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread