[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: "The serialization of the XML Infoset is XML" (WAS: [x

• To: Ryan_Tomayko@s... (Tomayko, Ryan)
• Subject: Re: "The serialization of the XML Infoset is XML" (WAS: [x
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:47:52 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <D037B3982A54D611BA5E0006293835400132E91A@s...> from "Tomayko, Ryan" at Sep 23, 2002 01:57:06 PM

Tomayko, Ryan scripsit:

> I think this statement holds true for the base infoset rec, but how does
> everyone feel about infoset extensions? I've been going over the latest
> XInclude rec and noticed that the following from section 4.5 - "Creating the
> Result Infoset" could potentially be harmful to John's statement:

Extensions to the Infoset are just that, extensions, and have no standard
serializations yet.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@r...  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com
"In computer science, we stand on each other's feet."
        --Brian K. Reid

• References:
  • "The serialization of the XML Infoset is XML" (WAS: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial))
    • From: "Tomayko, Ryan" <Ryan_Tomayko@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• Next by Date: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• Previous by thread: Re: "The serialization of the XML Infoset is XML" (WAS: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial))
• Next by thread: Why Are Inner and Outer Unclean? (WAS RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial))
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread