|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: xml schema
I would have commented but given that the article is over a year old, it is unlikely that any debate will ensue. If XML.com is interested in an article revisiting Kohsuke Kawaguchi's points you can email me offlist. -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM Old cars never die, they just smell that way. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Edd Dumbill [mailto:edd@u...] > Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 1:29 AM > To: XML-DEV > > On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 15:34, Dare Obasanjo wrote: > > Many statements in his article indicate his bias[0]. What > more do you > > want, a point by point rebuttal in a counter-article on XML.com? > > While I think that XML.com gives enough air-time to articles > showing many 'conventional' and innovative approaches to WXS, > something you are helping me with, there is always the > comment facility at the bottom of the article in which you > can make your objections public. > > Thoughtful and lively debate has always been something > XML.com welcomes. > > -- Edd >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








