[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: limits of the generic

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: limits of the generic
• From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:30:56 -0400
• In-reply-to: <1033401957.1770.555.camel@ibook> (Eric van der Vlist's messageof "30 Sep 2002 18:05:56 +0200")
• References: <r01050300-1015-4180C6D4D27811D68C880003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]><87ofaf1o90.fsf@n...> <1033401957.1770.555.camel@ibook>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> was heard to say:
| More specificaly, I remember that W3C XML Schema has been considered to
| map XHTML into XLink:
|
| http://xmlhack.com/read.php?item=781
|
| But don't remember if the reason why it has been abandoned has been made
| public.
|
| Can you elaborate or share some links with us? 

No, not really. I wasn't closely involved with XLink at the time and I
don't recall being involved in any such discussion.

Personally, it's not an interesting solution to me because I want
links to be manifest even in well-formed documents that don't have a
W3C XML Schema, let alone documents that use other schema technologies.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@S...    | One's never alone with a rubber duck.
XML Standards Architect |
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE9mHxAOyltUcwYWjsRAj9vAKCwqAcujmXcpvTvCE4q/debSLlxbgCgjR3y
rNr3p7A2q2WuO0VM9rvpOKI=
=rLNb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Notations for datatypes
• Next by Date: Re: FW: Groves (was re: bunch of other stuff...)
• Previous by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread