[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 20:32:01 +0000
• In-reply-to: <005c01c264cf$3eb23730$390a0a0a@gandalf>
• References: <r01050300-1015-AB19B254D0B611D6B29D0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]> <005c01c264cf$3eb23730$390a0a0a@gandalf>

"Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...> wrote:

| Fair enough, I meant no insult in my use of "purity". 

I wonder, do you view "quick and dirty" as a problem or as an opportunity
over the longer haul, and/or do you think of the longer haul at all?
 
| AR's true intentions shine through if you visit his Web page via IE:
| "SAY NO TO MICROSOFT!" 

Actually, that's "SAY NO TO MICRO$OFT!"; and I'm thinking of changing it
to "MICRO$OFT MUST DIE!!" ;-)

And yes, AFAIK, only users of IE (or, I suppose, of anything that embeds
the browser control) will see it.  That's known as "identifying one's
target audience", I believe. 

| or the following recent sig: "The day Microsoft makes something that 
| doesn't [expletive deleted] is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners...". 

Aww, I huwt a feewing...

| So I don't think it's unfair to question his attacks anytime someone 
| from (or associated with) MS replies to one of his posts.

Go right ahead. :-)

• References:
  • RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Fwd: War of Attrition (was: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial))
• Next by Date: RE: Fwd: War of Attrition (was: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial))
• Previous by thread: RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• Next by thread: Re: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread