Re: Datatypes - it's in the contract
Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...> wrote: | To me, the most fundamental reason for datatypes is to allow them to be | part of the contract between producers and consumers of data. Yes, and the specifics of contracts between producers and consumers vary across producers and consumers. | If the applications that use this data require data of the appropriate | type, and we want validation to be able to determine whether the contract | is being followed, Who is "we"? Weren't you talking about producers and consumers bound by some contractual understanding? Shouldn't that be "they"? | then we have to allow data types to be declared. Ah, declare! Have you heard of notation declarations? Just because you and I need to validate the farglebarps we exchange by contractual wgreement, does not imply that the rest of the universe "needs" to have validation of farglebarps built into their systems. Give up your seat at the table with the back room boys, and you may see this.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format