Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
 Hi Tim Tim said: Given the current power structure in our industry, all this talk on xml-dev about what people might and might not learn pretty well remains theorizing in absence of evidence. -Tim Didier replies: Yep. I totally agree with that. What is used on customers desktop is mainly decided by Redmond's people. What is used on the client side is what they decide. By the way, I just noticed that IE6 SP 1 supports XHTML 1.0. I just tested that with the following code and it displayed correctly. Notice that there is no more needs to include a space in the <br/> element. This is working only if the document MIME type is text/html (or with .htm/html file extension). If the MIME type is set to text/xml (or .xml file extension) then it appears with a hierarchical view of the XML document. I performed the same test in Mozilla 1.0 and the document was rendered with the MIME type set to text/xml. However, Mozilla didn't followed the</br> instruction to move to the next line and displayed the two text parts into a single line. Conclusion, it seems that the XHTML specifications have some importance and even if the implementation future is decided by Microsoft, it seems that W3 has still some influence on it. This is why the xlink/XHTML debate is so important. ----------------------------------------------- Very simple XHTML code snippet used for the test. <?xml version="1.0" ?> <html> <head> </head> <body> <p>is this working?<br/> all right... </p> </body> </html> Cheers Didier PH Martin 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
