Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
[Uche Ogbuji] To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...> > > RDDL would almost be an example of this approach. And the xlink namespace > > could be a default namespace, so the prefix would not have to be typed. It > > would also open up the possibility that these linking elements could contain > > optional annotation elements, which could be useful. > > Tut. tut. tut. Attributes do not get the default namespace. There is no > escaping the xlink prefix, or some prefix at least, under XMLNS 1.0. > Yes, I already blushed in public about that one! Cheers, Tom P
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format