[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)

• To: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>, Arjun Ray <aray@n...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• From: "m batsis" <mbatsis@n...>
• Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 13:47:43 -0700
• In-reply-to: <200209221142.49319.miles@m...>
• Organization: Netsmart.gr
• References: <00a901c2618d$a322b900$0400a8c0@gandalf> <p23rou42db0qg4afud7d426511h455k7ar@4...> <200209221142.49319.miles@m...>
• Reply-to: mbatsis@h...

On Sunday 22 September 2002 03:42, Miles Sabin wrote:

> Already in that example (head and body, title and link). Like I said,
> this is a mish-mash of XPath and s-exprs.

If it counts to anything, this would give concistency between PL and XSL code, 
giving the developer one view of XML to deal with. Looks nice, simple and 
easy, if you are familiar with XPath. Even if you are not, this seems easier 
to pick up than a common XML API object hierarchy.

Speaking of object hierarchies, I noticed the declaration

Element foo = ...

Which means you either need hooks to the host language constructors, or you 
have a conflict. Any other way to attach this to a host PL?

Manos

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• References:
  • RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
  • Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
  • Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• Next by Date: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• Previous by thread: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• Next by thread: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread