[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: RE: Semantic Web

  • To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>,"Mike Champion" <mc@x...>,<xml-dev@l...>
  • Subject: RE: RE: Semantic Web
  • From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:23:52 -0700
  • Thread-index: AcI3+v0JP1BWrbfxStCHBW2J/Jg8bQAGX++w
  • Thread-topic: RE: Semantic Web

ideal semantic web
> That is why Joshua's example of USENET is
> interesting.  A global ontology.  One assumes
> the users have to police it themselves.

There are two pieces to it:

* Global and public distribution/aggregation network: When you publish
something on USENET, it is immediately available to anyone who
subscribes to USENET.  The medium is public -- anyone can publish into
USENET.  Web pages, by contrast, require you to publish to a
privately-owned site, and require the reader to deliberately connect to
your private site to consume what you published.  In such a system, the
metadata is only available to the person who can "crawl" for it.  Push
vs. Pull.  Pull is ideal for the web, but push is ideal for semantic
web.

* Subject-Sensitive Filtering: In a "push" model, the amount of metadata
being pushed around globally will be overwhelming.  People need the
ability to filter out stuff they don't care about.  The newsgroup
hierarchy could be seen as an ontology, but I think of it as a very weak
one.  More like a set of "channels" that people can tune into or
broadcast on.  It's possible to post a message about Oracle in the
Microsoft newsgroup, and there is a chance that someone will be able to
answer your question.  But the channels exist so that
people/applications can voluntarily provide some filtering information.
I'm not saying that such "Channels" are *necessary* to a semantic web,
since ideally you could establish filters automatically based on any
metadata characteristic.  But USENET is an example of where someone
already solved the problem (albeit in a limited and low-tech way)

Architecturally, I think decentralized "push" and subject-oriented
"filtering" are essential for the semantic web.  And USENET (or IRC for
low-latency) is the definitive subject-oriented push communication
system.

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.