[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: version numbers and infosets

• To: j3322ptm@y... (J.Pietschmann)
• Subject: Re: version numbers and infosets
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 18:05:45 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3D407574.1070203@y...> from "J.Pietschmann" at Jul 26, 2002 12:02:28 AM

J.Pietschmann scripsit:

> I'm not sure what you are complaining about? We (a large
> swiss bank) *do* routinely exchange XML between a mainframe
> and machines running various other systems, including AIX,
> WinNT and Solaris, with mainframe software both producing and
> consuming XML, and we do so with XML 1.0. I can't see any
> advantage in using XML 1.1 for this purpose.

"Exchanging" is practical, if by that you mean a translation process
is used and the data is in migration.  But if the data were directly
*shared* via NFS, that would be another matter.

-- 
Deshil Holles eamus.  Deshil Holles eamus.  Deshil Holles eamus.
Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit.
Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit.
Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit.
Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!  Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!  Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!
  -- Joyce, _Ulysses_, "Oxen of the Sun"       jcowan@r...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• References:
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>

• Prev by Date: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Next by Date: Re: DNS based URIs that don't imply access method
• Previous by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Next by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread