|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: JDOM vs. JAXP/Xerces for XML document creation
> In practice JDOM code is *much* more > > portable across parsers than DOM implementations are. I have yet to > > be able to run a significant DOM program on two different DOM > > implementations (in Java) without debugging and rewriting > some code, > > even in those parts that are allegedly standard. > > Was it due to differences in interpretation of the > specifications, bugs in the implementations, or differences > between your interpretation and the implementation > interpretation? My experience of DOM is that there are lots of nasty subtle differences between implementations, for example in the handling of namespaces, the handling of entity references, and many other details. Usually when I go and check the spec it doesn't tell me which behavior is right, at least not without a week of study. > > > >- JDOM's architecture expolits the fact that there it > doesn't have to > > >worry about multiple implementations. Except that every version of JDOM has been incompatible with the one that went before - something that is very much a characteristic of software developed without the benefit of free-standing interface specifications. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@n... work: Michael.Kay@s...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








