[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead,isthereso

• To: "bryan" <bry@i...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead,istheresome other standard that should be looked at
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:56:40 -0400
• In-reply-to: <002701c227e4$cc226c70$2001a8c0@bryans>
• References: <002701c227e4$cc226c70$2001a8c0@bryans>

At 9:38 AM +0200 7/10/02, bryan wrote:

>I was just wondering since I don't do as much with Mozilla as I should,
>but if I remember correctly it's xlink implementation was all simple
>xlinks and didn't give any benefits beyond the basic html a link. Is
>that incorrect? If so can someone give me a succinct description of the
>xlink benefits Mozilla has above simple linking?

Your recollection is correct; simple links only. It's not exactly 
clear what a user interface for an extended link would look like or 
what it would mean.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          XML in a  Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/              |
|  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/  |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• References:
  • RE: Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead, istheresome other standard that should be looked at
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>

• Prev by Date: question: can anyone give me a reason why OWL should have datatypes?
• Next by Date: Test
• Previous by thread: RE: Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead, istheresome other standard that should be looked at
• Next by thread: Re: Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead, istheresomeother standard that should be looked at
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread