[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs,

• To: wperry@f... (W. E. Perry)
• Subject: Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs,
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 17:36:42 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l... (XML DEV)
• In-reply-to: <3D45B2F4.D9D98ED2@f...> from "W. E. Perry" at Jul 29, 2002 05:26:12 PM

W. E. Perry scripsit:

> Does this mean that, in practice, the distinction which you point to under the
> Namespaces Rec requires no difference in how instances are, in fact, processed?

In practice, the elements "foo" and "bar" may be treated identically.
Nothing can *require* a difference in how instances are processed.
At most, the various Recs require that two superficially different things
be treated the same way: for example, the XML Rec requires that a processor
report the same things for

	<foo bar="baz
zam"/>

and

	<foo bar="baz zam"/>

-- 
John Cowan                                <jcowan@r...>     
http://www.reutershealth.com              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Yakka foob mog.  Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork.  Chumble spuzz.
    -- Calvin, giving Newton's First Law "in his own words"

• References:
  • Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs,
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs,
• Next by Date: Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs,
• Previous by thread: Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs,
• Next by thread: Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread