[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: URI indigestion

• To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@i...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: URI indigestion
• From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
• Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 22:06:16 +0200
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B6E4@HQ5>

heh - it might well mess up a few of TimBL's hacks ;-)

apart from them, there shouldn't really be an impact - at worse you'd need
to make statements like

//politics-of-meaning hasURL http://politics-of-meaning

most people are using stuff like

len hasHomepage http://politics-of-meaning



---
Danny Ayers
<stuff> http://www.isacat.net </stuff>

Idea maps for the Semantic Web
http://www.isacat.net/ideagraph


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...]
>Sent: 25 July 2002 21:23
>To: 'John Cowan'
>Cc: dareo@m...; mc@x...; xml-dev@l...
>Subject: RE:  URI indigestion
>
>
>What would be the impact on RDF if it used these
>instead of URIs?
>
>Honest question because I don't use RDF but note
>that the current controversy started there.
>
>I loved the message in your sig.  It speaks
>to the "politics of meaning".
>
>len
>
>From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...]
>
>"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:
>
>> I also believe in markup Off The Web.  That is
>> one reason I like to keep Public IDs as an
>> option.  Call them URNs if you like.
>
>I do like, and consequently there is a mapping from
>Public IDs to a subset of URNs (those which begin
>"urn:publicid:";).
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>

• References:
  • RE: URI indigestion
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: URI indigestion
• Next by Date: Re: DNS based URIs that don't imply access method
• Previous by thread: Re: URI indigestion
• Next by thread: RE: URI indigestion
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread