Re: Re: URIs, concrete
I'm aware that RDF uses namespaced attributes. That doesn't bother me; I don't believe that there will be very many RDF documents containing: <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org" about="http://www.w3.org/not/really/I'm/just/kidding/"> If people are crazy enough to do that, I guess I don't have very much sympathy. > Simon St.Laurent scripsit: > Note that RDF *demands* that attributes be namespaced; the control ones > like id, about, resource *must* belong to the RDF namespace, and the > others that represent actual RDF properties (an optional use, you can > use elements instead) *must* belong to a namespace other than the RDF > one. > > Furthermore, XLink being an attribute-only architecture requires > namespaced > attributes. > > So please don't make general-purpose XML tools that outlaw namespaced > attributes! > > -- > John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan > jcowan@r... > Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In > fact, > at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the > door. > --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan > -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format