Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: URIs, concrete
 David Carlisle wrote: > > The namespaces specification leaves the relationship anomalous by > > providing no clear answer about the association. > > true (apart from a slightly incoherent non normative appendix) > but isn't that as it should be. Ie at about the same level as the > relationship between > <section> > <title> > > or > <html> > <head> > > ie totally unspecified at the level of XML 1.0 (or XML namespaces) I think that's a weak comparison at best, especially from the perspective (which monasticxml.org takes explicitly) that attributes are meta-markup, adding extra information about the nature of elements rather than being their children in any sense. In any event, the namespace status of child elements is clearly known, at least until W3C XML Schema's unqualified child elements poisons the context situation further. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
