|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersi
Simple expansions to the markup would be backward compatible. What others come to mind? And on another related tack, what role does backward compatibility play in an interchange environment? It would seem that interchange partners would have to be at the same revision level to safely interchange markup. Backward compatibility would allow for the older markup to be processed in a setting supporting newer markup, but the return trip would at risk for breakage (not necessarily in all circumstances, though). Since my situation involves interchange, it would seem that, unless the markup was at a particular, mutually supported version, special measures would have to be taken to ensure a viable interaction. What role, if any, should the namespace name play in this scenario? Mark -----Original Message----- From: ht@c... [mailto:ht@c...] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:46 PM To: Dare Obasanjo Cc: David Carlisle; jeni@j...; xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning I don't _think_ it's policy -- I believe backward incompatible changes should involve a namespace change.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








