[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XUL appears to be dead, is there some other standard that

• To: "Trevor Croll" <trevorcroll@f...>
• Subject: RE: XUL appears to be dead, is there some other standard that should be looked at
• From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:50:34 +0300
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcIj10A/ChSXi6yKT/iGMangh08PQgAHL5YA
• Thread-topic: XUL appears to be dead, is there some other standard that should be looked at

> From: Trevor Croll [mailto:trevorcroll@f...] 

> What\'s going on? What\'s the status?  Another good idea left to rust?

Well, it's a great language. When combined with Mozilla's other features
and standards support, makes a good web app platform.
Some stuff are hard to explore right now, that's for sure... You have to
view the damn source code to figure out where you are and what you can
do, which may not always be what you really want to do.


> Perhaps GNU Forms is the answer
> http://www.gnuenterprise.org/sections.php?op=viewarticle&artid=7

I'm not sure whether the two are comparable but anyway.

XUL has some very neat features in both widgets and layout model. Add
it's JavaScript1.5, The best DOM and CSS support amongst browsers, XML
and XSLT, MathML and many more...
Most importantly, XUL and friends fit well together, making it easier to
separate information, presentation, behavior and localization.

If only XForms where supported... Still working on that XUL Schema. 

Just think that I was hooked to XUL to write a tutorial; now  can't stop
myself.

Cheers,

Manos

• Prev by Date: XUL appears to be dead, is there some other standard that should be looked at
• Next by Date: Please help me to understand a basic concept.
• Previous by thread: RE: House of Representatives using XML
• Next by thread: Please help me to understand a basic concept.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread