[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Re: URIs, concrete

• To: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Re: URIs, concrete
• From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 18:45:06 -0600
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-E8CE898AA4E211D693BB0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

Simon wrote:
> In practice, I think the way around this is to encourage people 
> to treat attributes with no namespace as if they had the same 
> namespace as their element.  That doesn't have to mean a simple 
> reassignment, though it's certainly possible:
> <http://simonstl.com/ns/namespaces/attributes/>

How is what you're saying different than the semantics implied by local
scoping of elements/attributes (as defined in XSD)? If you assume local
scoping, you're treating them as members of a namespace qualified node.

-aaron
http://staff.develop.com/aarons

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Re: URIs, concrete
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: External parsed general entities
• Next by Date: RE: Re: URIs, concrete
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete
• Next by thread: RE: Re: URIs, concrete
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread