[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs, concre

• To: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• Subject: Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:42:49 -0700
• Cc: XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <20020729195028.LZBA24567.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@rwcrwbc70> <3D45A0EB.353D2D4D@f...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020722

W. E. Perry wrote:

> I agree with you. To return to the narrower question with which this began, is it not John and Tim who are arguing, in effect, that we must assign a different interpretation in the processing of a attribute that is in no namespace than we might
> assign in processing the same attribute as if it were in the namespace of its element?

Nobody's saying you *must* assign a different interpretation.  But 
you're allowed to if you want.  BTW, I think this is a design error in 
the namespace rec, but I also think we're probably stuck with it. -Tim

• References:
  • assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: jborden@a...
  • Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs again and again ....
• Next by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete
• Previous by thread: Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by thread: Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs,
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread