[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: version numbers and infosets

• To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: version numbers and infosets
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 13:28:56 -0400
• Cc: <xml-editor@w...>
• In-reply-to: <00b001c23252$a52b2350$4bc8a8c0@A...>
• References: <200207231226.NAA21321@m...><p04330100b963039b1e89@[192.168.254.4]><00b001c23252$a52b2350$4bc8a8c0@A...>

At 12:10 AM +1000 7/24/02, Rick Jelliffe wrote:

>Isn't is more like
>
>[ WF | WF+extras | valid ][ XML 1.1 | XML 1.0  ][ Namespace 1.0 | 
>Namespace 1.1 ]
>
>which is only 12 flavours?
>

This goes straight into XML 1.0 at the lowest level. In fact, it sets 
something up below the current lowest level (well-formed only). 
Worrying about variations from other specs like original namespaces 
and namespaces+errata and namespaces 1.1 and schemas and ... only 
multiplies the problems.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          XML in a  Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/              |
|  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/  |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• References:
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Next by Date: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Previous by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Next by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread