[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)

• To: XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:31:52 -0400
• Organization: Fiduciary Automation
• References: <200207291852.OAA15567@m...> <3D458EDF.6F5BEC46@f...> <006101c23735$46e1c230$0402a8c0@DBDELL130G>

Jeff Greif wrote:

> If foo can have both a bar attribute and a baz:bar attribute with different
> types of values or different interpretations in standard processing methods
> it would be easy to have a demonstrable difference in processing, depending
> upon which of them appeared in the instance.

But my question was whether (and if so, why) we could reasonably expect a
discernible difference in the semantic outcome from processing a particular
instance of a single given attribute in no namespace as if it were 'in the
namespace' of the element which it modifies.

Respectfully,

Walter Perry

• References:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread