Re: XPointer and XML Schema
"Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@h...> writes: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@h...> writes: > Just found it: > > Chapter 4.1 of RFC 2396 says: > <quote> > ... > The semantics of a fragment identifier is a property of the data > resulting from a retrieval action, regardless of the type of URI used > in the reference. Therefore, the format and interpretation of fragment > identifiers is dependent on the media type [RFC2046] of the retrieval > result. The character restrictions described in Section 2 for URI also > apply to the fragment in a URI-reference. Individual media types may > define additional restrictions or structure within the fragment for > specifying different types of "partial views" that can be identified > within that media type. > > > A fragment identifier is only meaningful when a URI reference is > intended for retrieval and the result of that retrieval is a document > for which the identified fragment is consistently defined. > > </quote> > > I believe the viewpoint that "the client determines what the fragment > identifier really means" is at odds with the definition in RFC 2396. Precisely -- the _server_ determines what the fragment identifier _really means_. More in another response to this thread. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c... URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format