|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: URIs, concrete
> To make it clear, I have no qualms whatsoever about making this change > in practice. I don't believe there are many legacy programs which > exhibit the behavior you describe, nor do I feel that the cost of the > change is particularly difficult, especially moving forward. > > Developers who follow my suggestion should be extremely unlikely to > create the brain-dead <x:foo bar="junk" x:bar="junque"> or even <x:foo > x:bar="junk">, thereby averting the continued creation of a larger mess. > > XML right now just keeps growing by agglomeration. I'd like to propose > that users start chopping off the rotten bits even if the spec > developers are presently unwilling. Bravo, Simon! We need to give XML as it has been W3C-ed exactly the same treatment as XML 1.0 gave SGML. I mean, did anyone really care about breaking an SGML installation that used RANK? Ditto for <x:foo bar="junk" x:bar="junque">. Sam Hunting eTopicality, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Turn your searching experience into a finding experience."(tm) Topic map consulting and training: www.etopicality.com Free open source topic map tools: www.goose-works.org XML Topic Maps: Creating and Using Topic Maps for the Web. Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-74960-2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








