[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Question for the XPath and DOM folks

• To: uche.ogbuji@f... (Uche Ogbuji)
• Subject: Re: Question for the XPath and DOM folks
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 01:25:15 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: mc@x... (Mike Champion), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <E17W7KP-0006bv-00@m...> from "Uche Ogbuji" at Jul 20, 2002 09:23:52 PM

Uche Ogbuji scripsit:

> I should make the point, though, that Megginson's choices in SAX 1.0 do seem 
> remarkably prescient.  It came after DOM L1, but only a little bit afterwards. 
>  Also, IIRC, Megginson also waved off the SML crowd, so it's interesting that 
> SAX got things so rightly.

ESIS had a lot to do with it, I think.

-- 
John Cowan                                   jcowan@r...
        "You need a change: try Canada"  "You need a change: try China"
                --fortune cookies opened by a couple that I know

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Question for the XPath and DOM folks
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>

• References:
  • Re: Question for the XPath and DOM folks
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark)
• Next by Date: RE: Question for the XPath and DOM folks
• Previous by thread: Re: Question for the XPath and DOM folks
• Next by thread: RE: Question for the XPath and DOM folks
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread