[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XPointer and XML Schema

• To: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Subject: Re: XPointer and XML Schema
• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Date: 18 Jul 2002 17:01:53 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200207181549.g6IFncv09355@d...>
• References: <f5b7kjt5eak.fsf@c...><f5bit3e8gsj.fsf@c...> <f5badoq8gg0.fsf@c...><1026926380.19731.104.camel@ibook><200207181549.g6IFncv09355@d...>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter)

Joe English <jenglish@f...> writes:

> Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> 

<snip/>

> If a user agent must implement these three cases to be
> considered sensible, I doubt that we'll ever see widespread
> adoption of XPointer.

That should be "considered sensible by Henry" --- for my
considerations to determine what got adopted, I'd have to be a _whole_
lot more powerful than I am :-)

What will actually happen in the market once the IETF makes their
decision is an empirical question.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

• References:
  • Re: XPointer and XML Schema
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: XPointer and XML Schema
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: XPointer and XML Schema
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: XPointer and XML Schema
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: What kind of trap is XPointer?
• Next by Date: Re: XML Base (RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark)
• Previous by thread: Re: XPointer and XML Schema
• Next by thread: Re: XPointer and XML Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread