|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Is Anyone Interested In XPath 2.0 Use Cases or Requiremen
> Um... (thinks, scribbles in *scratch*, checks spec) Ah I accidentally demonstrated the first law of Xpath: If you are about to write != then write not( = ) instead. Of course it proves both my point Yes it can be done in Xpath 1 and Dare's Yes it is unreadable and prone to user error without some extra set operation primitives. Unfortunately as things stand to get the extra set operations you have to get the whole of XPath 2 which means that you go from a usable language with a few obscure quirks to something that is completely obscure, non portable and unusable. Progress of a sort I suppose. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








