[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box

• To: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>,"Mike Champion" <mc@x...>,"John Cowan" <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: RE: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 12:17:28 -0700
• Cc: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcIQrHnFcZgY+DkfTEOr/a4Cs4A7HAABoC2w
• Thread-topic: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Skonnard [mailto:aarons@d...] 
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:27 AM
> To: 'Mike Champion'; 'John Cowan'
> Cc: 'Simon St.Laurent'; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE: RE:  W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, 
> says Don Box
> 
> 
> Agreed. HTTP and HTML were not trivial to implement. Major 
> vendors embraced them and made it happen. Before the public 
> had easy-to-use browsers, they had no idea what resources 
> were available to them. I don't remember many successful 
> ad-hoc browser implementations.
> 

Hate to pile in on you there Aaron but I have to add my voice to thoe
who would describe HTTP as trivial to implement. I remember implementing
a decent subset of it in a web server I wrote for a 2 week long school
assignment as an exercise in working with multithreading.

As for HTML, I'm not so sure about but given the lack of web browsers in
general usage there may be some truth in the claim that it is less than
trivial to fully implement. 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
The shortest distance between two points is under repair.

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

• Prev by Date: RE: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by Date: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Previous by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread