[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box

• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 12:36:12 -0400
• Cc: "'Paul Prescod'" <paul@p...>, xml-dev@l...
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B547@HQ5>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Can you elaborate, please, on what is the "document style"?

When SOAP is used to ship arbitrary XML documents, as opposed to the RPC 
encoding of Section 5.

Paul Prescode:
 > According to the SOAP intelligensia, the
> document style is the future of SOAP.

Your REST bias is showing, Paul. :)  Certainly many feel that way (MSFT 
being one of the most vocal proponents), but not all of us.
	/r$

• Follow-Ups:
  • Actually, resistance is proving far from futile
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by Date: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Previous by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread