|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] FW: Why datatypes?
Michael asks: >Any chance of rewriting that for an international readership? A layman's paraphrasing: the job of the National Security Agency (NSA) is to be a set of intelligent ears for the US. It gathers data (signals), tries to filter this into information (de-noise it to determine which signals are relevant given some set of criteria passed to it by other authorities), and refines that into information that it passes back to the requesting authority. The requesting authority must be "wise" in what it asks for and what it does given a result. Assets are limited; pattern recognition and latency are key issues for formulating a response within a context of interrelated topics. (It is illustrative to understand why the Brits and Canadians armed B-24 Liberators with 30 caliber ammunition vs the American use of 50 caliber.) In other words: 1. It is given topics of interest. 2. It listens to as much conversation as it can store and process. 3. It filters that to find conversations that are on-topic. 4. It summarizes and passes that on to those to whom a topic is of interest such that that authority can make strategic decisions. That is the intelligence game as practiced by cryptographers. They do not determine strategy; they enable its validation. XML is a code for sending signals. Beyond that, signals have to be interpreted and unless one has rules for handling topics, it is still just signal. All rules are local but a locale is just another way to say "agreement on the topics of interest". Nodes is nodes. Properties is properties. Tell me who gets to name the names so we can get on with business. len
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








