Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
 Don Box wrote: > In case it wasn't obvious, that sentence should have read "What good are > datatypes if one CANNOT work in terms of the value space..." Why, yes, that is precisely the question. Or, phrasing it from the opposite perspective, we might (should!) ask why XML would accept datatyping based on anything other than the lexical. The nature of XML is lexical (it's text). The advantages of XML are lexical (system independence, data permanence, and interoperability are predicated on acceptance of a syntax, not a data model nor a processing strategy beyond parsing for well-formedness). Do what you please locally in your particular rendition of 'value space', because of course you have to instantiate your data to a local understanding of it if you are to do anything useful for you with it. Just don't impose that understanding on your correspondent or counterparty with whom your a priori agreement extends only so far as XML syntax. The compelling argument for XML, like the compelling argument for an internetwork topology over an homogenous enterprise network, is that you can address, and perhaps perform useful data interchange or transaction execution with, imperfectly-known counterparties with whom your only shared assumptions are lexical. Defending, developing, and promoting XML has got to be about preserving that core premise. Preserving that premise has got to require, at times, rejecting extensions of XML's common denominator of agreements into features--however apparently useful--which constrain the possibilities inherent in the lexical basis. As far as I can see, it is always an easy test whether some appealing feature is of its own nature in the lexical or the value space. If the feature is based primarily upon a model rather than a text or if it doesn't have an obvious 'XML serialization', reject it because it is not XML. And if you need that feature and the model it serves more than you need to preserve the lexical basis and possibilities of XML, well then you have made it clear that the feature belongs somewhere other than in the domain of a markup specification predicted upon lexical agreements. Respectfully, Walter Perry 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
