Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
John Cowan <jcowan@r...> wrote: | Arjun Ray scripsit: | I simply say that a design which ignores it will not fly. Well, you said "The practice of the XML community has been overwhelmingly to grant the GI fundamental importance". From this, I don't see how it follows that ability to use the same name for distinct things is critical. Does this help organize processing of instances? If it doesn't, how could it help expressiveness in composing schemas? Overloading is too geeky not to be confusing. |> I note that you dodged the question again. ;-) | | Are you asking for my *personal* views? Any view that propounds a coherent argument (and thus, inter alia, explains the motivation to treat attributes and child elements alike.) | I don't intend to be in the business of legislating how programmers and | document designers do their jobs. Sharp tools cut. Badly designed ones cut more often.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format