[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9

Re:  Come On
John Cowan <jcowan@r...> wrote:
| Arjun Ray scripsit:

| I simply say that a design which ignores it will not fly.

Well, you said "The practice of the XML community has been overwhelmingly
to grant the GI fundamental importance".  From this, I don't see how it
follows that ability to use the same name for distinct things is critical.
Does this help organize processing of instances?  If it doesn't, how could
it help expressiveness in composing schemas?  Overloading is too geeky not
to be confusing.

|> I note that you dodged the question again. ;-)
| Are you asking for my *personal* views?

Any view that propounds a coherent argument (and thus, inter alia,
explains the motivation to treat attributes and child elements alike.)

| I don't intend to be in the business of legislating how programmers and
| document designers do their jobs.  Sharp tools cut.

Badly designed ones cut more often.


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.