|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part
Rick Jelliffe wrote: > Is there any need for explicit namespace declarations in the DTD at all? > > Why not just assign whole element sets to a namespace, in the > external DSDL framework, and leave the syntax of DTDs exactly as it is? So how do I declare content models that use elements from more than one set, such as: <!ELEMENT a:A (b:B, c:C)> Do I just use prefixes in the syntax and leave the prefix declarations to some external mechanism, as your "typicalPrefix" attribute seems to imply? Or do I simply not declare such elements with a DTD? > There is > probably some sweet spot with DTDs where if you have too many > kinds of declarations it puts more people off than it attracts: Which I think John's suggestion is close to hitting. I'd guess it's: DTDs + namespaces + simple element types -- Ron
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








