[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box

• To: "bryan" <bry@i...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 08:34:30 -0700
• Thread-index: AcIPAD0dv9JjwskdSsOff9SvFc7k/QAAXEyt
• Thread-topic: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box

Sam Ruby was there and answers why Don thinks SOAP is still needed[0] regardless of the existence of W3C XML Schema. He says "Don's answer to this question was extensibility; more specifically, the ability to add headers[1]." 
 
[0] http://radio.weblogs.com/0101679/2002/06/06.html#a549 
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-soap12-20010709/#_Toc478383497

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: bryan [mailto:bry@i...] 
	Sent: Sat 6/8/2002 8:19 AM 
	To: xml-dev@l... 
	Cc: 
	Subject: RE:  W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
	
	

	Okay the quote "Had XML Schema been done in 1998, we would not have done
	SOAP," makes me wonder why not? Is it because with XML Schema being the
	"..foundation for the rest of XML" no one is going to want to build
	anything in any way ambitious cause it's just too painful?
	
	Ooh I feel bad.
	
	
	
	-----------------------------------------------------------------
	The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
	initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
	
	The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
	
	To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
	manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
	
	

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by Date: Re: xsi:type and broken contracts
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread