Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part
Arjun Ray scripsit: > Yes, but the point (as far as I can discern from the spec) is that only > the resolved/expanded/whatevered "universal name" is relevant post-parse. > Inter alia, this would mean that the revised DTD syntax is not required to > use (or identify) the specific colonifying prefixes in the instance. Just so. > I don't see any reason to have it except to infect DTD syntax with > colonification. The purpose of it is to allow validation of elements and attributes that are named not with lexically apparent names but with XML Namespaces universal names. Why people want to use namespaces, or why they shouldn't, is out of scope. -- John Cowan <jcowan@r...> http://www.reutershealth.com I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format