[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XML Infoset vs XML Tagged Text

• To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@c...>,"Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@t...>
• Subject: RE: XML Infoset vs XML Tagged Text
• From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 16:15:32 +0300
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcIV/8fLkbKNzmQWSBC2P+wNJqu7lQAALwvA
• Thread-topic: XML Infoset vs XML Tagged Text

I agree with Rick Jelliffe; most people when mentioning the Infoset have
a well formed, valid XML document (thus serializable) in mind.

Regards,

Manos



> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@c...] 

> Why the restriction? Isn't [1] clear enough?
> 
> Jean-Jacques.
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/#intro
> 
> Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> 
> >As an extra twist on this, may I recommend that any rfc  
> make it clear that 
> >when talking about XML infosets, we only mean "XML Infosets 
> that can be 
> >serialized into XML documents."
> >
> >This is because "XML infoset" unfortunately seem to have a 
> life of its
> >own, often being something more like the "DOM infoset".  This gives
> >the potential for a mismatch.
> >
> >Cheers
> >Rick Jelliffe
> >  
> >
> 
> 

• Prev by Date: Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed
• Next by Date: Re: MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility
• Previous by thread: Namespaces and DTDs - Why not use what we have?
• Next by thread: Re: MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread