|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: English sentences, was: Re: Announce: XML Sc
Rick Jelliffe wrote: [[ From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...> > Actually this _is_ the original point, isn't it? No, the original point is the use-case where there is no dispute about what characters are used. The user can toss coins to decide, we have no more interest in their particular ranges than we care about their particular content models. ]] By that interpretation, we don't allow alternate spellings of the words "facade" and "cooperate". End of story. John was making that point that such definitions are not a reliable way to determine what language a piece of text is written in. I am agreeing. [[ All the rest of the discussion has been a red herring, and I have seen that fish before. Basically it comes down to a denial of the use case. ]] I changed the topic on purpose. If the use case is to restrict a character string to a specific set of characters, terrific. It's not particularly interesting and deserves not much more comment. The issue of detection of human language, on the other hand, is one that interests me. So my 'original point' was not pointed at the same location in the thread as your 'original point' ... that's the way these email threads go, eh? No surprise. Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








