[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box

• To: "'John Cowan'" <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 10:25:47 -0600
• Cc: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <200206101608.MAA29625@m...>

> Aaron Skonnard scripsit:
> 
> > All I'm suggesting is that those working groups could have chosen
not to
> > build on XML Schema if they really believed it was severely flawed
and
> > there were better alternatives.
> 

John Cowan:

> And I suggest, on the contrary, that self-censorship 
> ("gotta use the official
> schema language, even if we think it sux") 
> MAY be operating here.

Yep, that's exactly what I'm saying (although I don't think it [expletive deleted]). 

If all major vendors support it, even though some developers think it
[expletive deleted], I'm going to embrace it just like I did with HTTP.

-aaron

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>

• References:
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by Date: Re: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread