[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9

• To: dalapeyre@m... (Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre)
• Subject: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 16:01:57 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <a05100314b92ff54692b5@[192.168.254.9]> from "Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre" at Jun 14, 2002 03:39:07 PM

Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre scripsit:

> And the harm in requiring more precision in an XML document than
> I need in casual conversation is what exactly?

The flexibility of being able to overload names that are conceptually
similar or equivalent but distinct at the implementation level.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
    • From: Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre <dalapeyre@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility
• Next by Date: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Previous by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Next by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread