|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: Re: Re: DSDL: use cases: name
David Carlisle wrote: > > > In which ways is this set of names not a namespace? > > It could have been defined as being a namespace but the namespace REC (in 5.2) says > > If the URI reference in a default namespace declaration is empty, then > unprefixed elements in the scope of the declaration are not considered > to be in any namespace. > > which explictly says that that set is _not_ a namespace, so presumably > it isn't. > It says that "[they] are not considered to be in any namespace," which claim, as I noted, is bogus. That is, it is "spurious, fictitions, and a sham", and is inconsistent with the earlier definition. So what does one call this 'set of names which has the name "", but which one can for historical reasons not call a namespace'? ...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








