[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto a


Re:  Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto    a
At 10:26 AM 6/24/2002 -0700, Paul Prescod wrote:
>I think it is worth pointing out that tag ommission and short-tagging
>are light years away from each other in terms of language parsing theory
>and practical implications. Most programming languages use
>short-tagging. i.e.
>
>if(foo){
>
>
>}

Yes, and as a result I have constant problems with balancing braces and 
frequently end up with things like:
    }//end if
   }//end for
  }//end if
}//end method

Parsing theory and human capabilities aren't always a good match.  There 
are, of course, lots of tools that deal with simplifying these problems...

Simon St.Laurent
"Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.